Harvard University School of Arts and Sciences Freedom of Speech Guidelines Inquiry
The Harvard Undergraduate Council has called for a faculty review of the school’s free speech guidelines after Sunday night’s meeting.
The law, one of three bills proposed after the conference, requires the Faculty of Arts and Sciences (FAS) to update its 1990 guidelines for free speech.
The guidelines state that: “Freedom of speech is very important to the university because we are a community working on rational and rational discourse.
“The free exchange of ideas is essential to our key function of discovering and disseminating ideas through research, education and learning. Reducing freedom of expression undermines the intellectual freedom that defines our goals. I’m going to get there.
The Harvard Undergraduate Council (UC) has called for a faculty review of the school’s free speech guidelines after Sunday night’s meeting. The law, one of three proposed after the conference, proposed to update the guidelines on freedom of expression (pictured), which have not been updated since the establishment of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences. sciences (FAS) in 1990. ..
“It also deprives some individuals of the right to express unpopular views and others to hear unpopular views,” he added.
The guidelines also said Harvard University “is taking certain risks in giving freedom of expression such a high priority,” but did not disclose what those risks were.
According to The Harvard Crimson, the guidelines allow protests against speakers, but do not allow protesters to block the public from listening to or watching the event.
Harvard Police will also set a deadline for expelling or arresting protesters and will propose penalties for those who obstruct free speech.
The Undergraduate Student Council recommended that the school establish a review committee made up of the same number of undergraduate students and staff.
The legislation they proposed reads: As Harvard Crimson reported, “The Undergraduate Council does not advocate specific changes to the free speech guidelines without the direct input of student groups.” .
The law also stated that UC would like to convey student views to the jury in future referendums and policy recommendations.
According to The Harvard Crimson, the law was passed unanimously.
Two other proposals made by UC after Sunday’s meeting included legislation to form social inclusion grants for students and schools funding nighttime transportation programs. paddy field.
The Harvard Crimson reported that the social inclusion grants have revived funds previously made available by UC. The fund was used by students to organize “social inclusion” events and parties with financial support.
Two other laws passed include social inclusion grants for students (obtaining $ 6,000 of UC funding provided over eight weeks) and funding for a nighttime transportation program in partnership with Lyft. It was.
The University of California, Los Angeles cites the need for safe and efficient travel “especially since it is colder” due to the early closure of public transportation due to the pandemic.
The program will provide $ 6,000 of UC funding over an eight-week period to secure up to $ 750 of events each week.
Each week, UC grants fund events for under 50 guests and one large event for over 50 guests and are available to all Harvard students.
According to The Harvard Crimson, students can submit their applications before 6 p.m. every Sunday, prioritizing events that wouldn’t happen without a grant.
The third and final law passed was nighttime traffic, working with Lyft, due to the need to travel safely and efficiently “especially since it gets colder” as the pandemic shut down public transport early . Funded the program.
“The importance of traveling efficiently… I can’t say the least,” the law reads.
The Transportation Fund attracts up to 500 students and receives commuting credits of up to $ 15.